The Gigolog

This blog has moved

noreply@blogger.com (Trevor) — Sat, 01 May 2010 20:26:00 +0000

This blog is now located at http://the-gigolos.blogspot.com/.
You will be automatically redirected in 30 seconds, or you may click here.

For feed subscribers, please update your feed subscriptions to
http://the-gigolos.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default.

standing room only

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Bracewell) — Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:46:00 +0000

The imminent release of The Gigolos on DVD brings awkward memories flooding back like a dose of hypnotherapy. Look into my eyes, you are feeling very tired...

During pre-production we were constantly beset by should vs could.

Should we get an office in Soho? Everybody else has one. But I could work from my desk in Norfolk, save the money, and produce the movie in my pyjamas.

Still, the office obsession is a hard habit to break. One of our cast knew a guy who knew a bloke who was offering a space in west London for a month. Great! A London address, respectability, and a place to store the kit.

We recce the space. Up 4 flights without a lift, and we're sitting in a tiny waiting room, ready to be shown into our benefactor's office. The room is cramped, enough space for the two of us to stretch our legs, as long as we do it one person at time, one leg at a time.

Our benefactor arrives, There isn't enough space for him to get into the waiting room to greet us, so he waves through the doorway. He makes the usual joke about whether we're making a porn movie, before wishing us every success.

What about the office?

We're sitting in it.

The room is 5 foot at its widest, and there's space for a desk and two people to sit at it. Having a desk, though, leaves no room for those two people to pass one another. Arrival times at the office will have to be staggered, giving the first person enough time to get into position before the second person arrives: once in position, the first person won't be able to leave their post for the entire day, not even to piss.

Talking of which, we check the facilities. There's a urinal and a tap, but no toilet. The owner explains that "to do a shit" you have to repair to the Lord Elgin pub across the road. Lord Elgin opens its doors 11-3 for lunch. Our production team will have to open its bowels during the same period. I'm mentally drafting the ad for the jobs page of the Media Guardian:

ASSISTANT PRODUCER REQUIRED FOR LONDON FEATURE FILM SHOOT
no experience necessary, but must be prepared to shit only between hours of 11am and 3pm
Punk Cinema Ltd is an equal opportunities employer etc

The owner phoned me later to see if I was interested. "It's got broadband," he added, as if that made up for the absence of anywhere to defecate.

I went back to Norfolk to put on my pyjamas.

BBC

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:37:00 +0000

Back with a bang.

We've been away from The Gigolos since July when the theatrical release ended, working on our new feature, a thriller called Cuckoo.

The BBC has acquired The Gigolos for UK TV broadcast. UK TV premiere will happen in 2008.

We're working now on the DVD release. More to follow shortly.

Sweet Sorrow

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Bracewell) — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:32:00 +0000

I'm spending much less time now with The Gigolos. We had become close. I grew it from a seed; nurtured it; sent it out into the world. It's grown up now. It's learned to take the hard knocks (Stella Papamichael) and to accept the praise gracefully (Derek Malcolm). And if you think those metaphors are mixed up, you should see the final accounts for the film.

I'm writing this as advice to those thinking about making a movie. It will demand your unquestioning day-and-night dedication for months, more likely years. It will make you cry with pain and joy, though mainly frustration. It will give you precious little in returns.

There are other films now. But The Gigolos will always be the first. Here's hoping it won't also be the last.

Breakthroughs

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Fri, 04 May 2007 17:33:00 +0000

All eyes on Edinburgh as the SNP claims election victory for the Scottish Parliament. Meanwhile, a less-publicised "breakthrough" is happening. We've broken north of the border, and the first screening of The Gigolos in Scotland happens tonight at the Cameo in Edinburgh.

Waterblogged

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:32:00 +0000

Richard has become a columnist who blogs (a blogamist?) about film on The Guardian website. First blog went live yesterday. Subtly witty, a bit like The Gigolos. Not everyone's going to get it. In fact, let's hope lots of people get the wrong end of stick. (Let's particularly hope that Stella Papamichael from the BBC reads it & is confused. Altho she won't read it cos she'll be busy getting the wrong end of the stick elsewhere.)

I've wasted Sat morning reading posts - they're priceless! Most "commentators" seem to read the first few lines of the blog until they find something to disagree with, venting their anger without bothering to read the whole thing. Then they disagree with other people's comments, rather than discuss what the article is saying. It's like a noisy pub late at night, where a fight breaks out amongst strangers for a reason no one remembers. Concepts such as "irony" and "subtlety", carefully honed over centuries of the English language, are lost. Richard's so far been accused of being sexist, writing lazy journalism etc. which anyone who knows Richard would find hysterical.

Fortunately, nowhere near as bad as the comments which greet any Peter Bradshaw blog. It doesn't matter what he writes, readers are there ready to pounce and try him for any crime.

Are blogs perhaps replacing therapists? You read something you don't like, you get angry, post a comment, get it out of your system, then get back to normal.

South by South-West

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:47:00 +0000

South-West England is falling for The Gigolos. We've got week-long bookings in Exeter, Cardiff, Barnstaple and Exmouth. What is about the South West and Gigolos? Answers on a postcard. Now we need the rest of the country to catch up with the South West.

Kino - is this the future of cinema?

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:36:00 +0000

Gigolos Roadshow comes to Mid-Kent. In Hawkhurst for Q&A after screening at Kino, the first purpose-built digital cinema in the UK. First time watching the film on digital projection: it looks great, you can't see the joins. The place is amazing, a real passion for film and for breaking the mould. Great question from the audience: "You look like you had lots of fun making the film - did you?" We did. The most fun bits can't be mentioned, in case any lawyers are reading. But amongst the sweat & tears 0f making & releasing a film, never forget how much fun it is. I love Kino because they have the same fun & passion. If digital cinema has more people like this behind it, there will be some kind of revolution in what's screened in UK cinemas. Who knows what shape it will take, but it will change, eventually..

Gigolos on Leicester Square

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Tue, 10 Apr 2007 06:15:00 +0000

Two years ago I drank Guinness in All Bar One on Leicester Sq before watching Star Wars III: Revenge of the Sith at the Odeon. Two years on, I'm in the same bar with Trevor, again drinking Guinness. Except today, we're going to walk across the square to watch The Gigolos at the Prince Charles. Strange feeling, one of the strangest so far. It's Bank Holiday Monday and Leicester Sq seems busy. But will people walk off the street to watch The Gigolos? We haven't got any small green Jedi with lightsabres, although the Force is strong with Sacha when charming the older ladies.

Outside the Prince Charles people stare at the poster. Some go in. If only we had an extended run in the West End - it would work, people want to see this film.

The Prince Charles is a great venue. Top people - they show us to the Quentin Tarantino Bar (QT loves this cinema, what more do you need?), then the Kevin Smith Memorial Cubicle. Kevin Smith was here recently and joked that he deserved a memorial bar as much as QT. So the cinema gave him a cubicle.

120 or so watch the film. Good for a bank holiday. But is it enough for more screenings? Who knows. But we've achieved something great here. We've put an indie, debut Brit film with two new actors playing the leads on in the heart of the West End. Plus, Katherine Kelly who plays Becky Grainger in CORONATION STREET came, loved it & we had drinks afterwards. What more do you need?

We've caught the bug. Leicester Square is where we need to be. For this film, or the next.

Go West

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:27:00 +0000

6 days on.
Phonecall from Sara Ewin, our fantastic theatrical booker (who does all the bookings into cinemas and transports copies of the film across the country).
We're in the West End!
This is fucking fantastic news. Never thought this would be possible.
We're screening at the Prince Charles on Leicester Sq (love that cinema). It's the all-important toehold in the West End. We've got to do everything possible to pack out that screening and build from there.
In the immortal words of Go West, "We close our eyes to see the final frame". Whatever happened to Go West? How far west did they actually go?

The Blonde Beggar of Bethnal Green

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Bracewell) — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:43:00 +0000

Friday: I'm emerging from the Radio 4 cocoon when Craig (editor) texts me with news of a storming review in London Lite. This is a free newspaper distributed during morning rush hour; but it's now 5pm, and the vendors have all gone home. Desperate to see the review before it becomes tomorrow's celebrity autobiography, I hit the streets in search of a discarded copy.

There's a guy reading one in the window of Starbucks. He's alone, waiting for someone. I want his paper. He wants a fuck for the night - that's why he's sitting alone in the window of a Soho Starbucks. I mouth through the glass that I want his article. He misunderstands. I retreat.

I think about checking the bins, but there's a guy already doing that - does he have a review out, too?

Then down to the Tube, last resting place of a million free handout newspapers. It's rush hour, jammed, and I can't get through the carriage. I miss my stop - Liverpool Street - letting the train empty. Down the carriage, picking up papers, looking for the golden ticket. The train has left Bethnal Green and is well on its way to the end of the line when I find a copy, slightly soiled - but it's not human, so I'll live with it.

It's 4 stars. A treat. I sit down to savour it. It's then I notice all around me, discarded on seats, copy after copy of London Lite, hundreds of them. (No one takes them home to clip and file, like I shall do with my precious edition.) The review is already tomorrow's Ashley Cole autobiography.

Stella Papamichael's BBC review - a reply

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Bracewell) — Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:23:00 +0000

http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2007/03/19/
the_gigolos_2007_review.shtml

Dear Stella,

Sorry to read that you didn't like The Gigolos. I watch plenty of movies I don't like, and wouldn't think twice about telling a filmmaker what I thought of their work, so I'm not taking issue with any of your opinions.

As a professional film reviewer, however, you'll appreciate being corrected on a couple of technical points.

You write about "the obvious lack of a lighting budget"...

But The Gigolos was lit, using the following equipment:

2x 650W Softlights
4ft Kino flo 4 Bank at 3200K
1x 2K Fresnel Spotlight
2x 650W Fresnel Spotlight
4x 100W Dedolight

The cost of hiring these lights was relatively small, compared to the cost of other production consumables such as film stock - but you would know this, as a professional film reviewer.

The film was lit deliberately and in such a way as to make it look like a documentary, rather than a fiction film. Artificial (tungsten) lighting was used in conjunction with daylight, and then not colour-corrected, in order to give the false impression that the film was unlit.

It's much harder to create the false impression of a documentary than it is to light and grade all scenes to the same colour temperature, as you might for a tv drama.

If you point a film camera at a darkening room which has not been lit by a DoP, it's unlikely that you'll have enough light to make an exposure. With film, no light doesn't produce black, it simply produces a grey mush on the negative.

In other words, you can't just "point and shoot" a movie; every shot has to be lit in some way, even if you're creating shadows. But you would know this, as a professional film reviewer.

The Gigolos is supposed to look like a documentary, in the same way that Sacha Tarter uses his own name for his character. But the film is no more a low-budget documentary than Sacha is a real gigolo.

Keep up the good work!

Richard

Manic Monday

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:53:00 +0000

Monday morning is all about what's called the "holdovers". That's when cinema programmers look at how films have performed over the w/e (Fri, Sat & Sun), then decide what they're going to play for next w/e. 300 has done excellent international box office, so that's sure to stay on & extend to more screens. We feel swamped in someone else's business... but a good result: we're going to be screening at the Ritzy Picturehouse Brixton from next Friday for a week. So, we're in London for another week. No West End yet, but this is not a bad outcome.

Saturday Night & Sunday Morning

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:37:00 +0000

The figures seem to say we did OK in Clapham last night. No idea what this really means, but people are coming to see the film. I expect it will come down to how we perform in comparison to the other films (300 opens this weekend, plus Becoming Jane is still doing well - how much Jane Austen does the public need?).
But the reviews keep coming - 3 stars today from the Sunday Times, 3 from the Sunday Telegraph. Reviewers are generally really getting the film & getting behind us.
Sunday Telegraph says: "a disarming debut from writer-director Richard Bracewell that subverts your every expectation with each new scene"; "the leads are excellent"; "around them, Brafcewell does interesting things with London as a melancholy, past-its-prime location".
Yippeeee! That's fantastic.
How does this translate to bums on seats?
No idea. That's for tomorrow morning.
Will it be Happy Mondays, or Monday Bloody Monday?

Confessions of a PR Virgin

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Bracewell) — Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:24:00 +0000

Chatted to Francine Stock about The Gigolos. They recorded it for the film programme on Radio 4. She asked about the length of time it's taken to get the film released; I thought about the pain of pitching cinemas, raising finance, the struggle of getting an unknown movie to the screen.

It has caused us pain, yes; but at least it's our pain. The grief belongs to us. We own the effort.

We didn't sign to distributor. We don't have a PR company trying to pitch us as Confessions of a Male Escort. We don't have a publicist thinking that the only way to get bums on seats is to lie about the number of bums on screen.

Amazing Grace is also released this weekend. Publicity for the film is being driven by lengthy newspaper debate about the 200th anniversary of the Abolition of Slavery. That is: a PR company is using Abolition to generate column inches for the release of a film, with the aim of generating money for its investors and producers.

We're all trying to make money from our movies - why else would we do it? But does it have to be done by exploiting the debate around Abolition? Who's being enslaved here?

Critics Choice

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:03:00 +0000

Thousands of Londoners are commuting into work right now reading a fantastic review in Metro:
"seek out this cliche-confounding, utterly intriguing debut Brit flick".
Wow!
The film is "a real rough gem".
Wooow!
It doesn't stop there: we're number five in Metro's Critics Choice Top Ten! That means we'll appear every day for the next week.
Wooooooooooow!
Surely surely surely this has to encourage people to see the film? Surely this must translate to bums on seats?

Stars in our Eyes

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:10:00 +0000

Wake up to an avalanche of positive reviews - some seriously good.
Can it be possible? Do people like the film?
4 stars from London Lite - with the great headline: "Men of the night a wierdly comic delight". That's better than anyone's ever summed up the film.
4 stars in the Daily Mirror - the "shot in the arm that British cinema could well do with".
3 stars in the Evening Standard - "an original debut".
4 stars from What's On In London - "highly original drama".
3 stars from the Daily Express.
A great, intelligent review from Sukhdev Sandhu in the Telegraph: "Bracewell...evokes with poetic clarity the loneliness of late-night London".
Today's only crap review is the Guardian of all places. More of this later. Can't let that get us down, got a movie to release.
Almost overcome with emotion after all these great reviews. After three years of struggle, no salary, highs & lows, the film is at cinemas, most reviewers like it - and some really like it. It might just work.

old age concerns

noreply@blogger.com (Richard Bracewell) — Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:48:00 +0000

Eat, drink and be very afraid, for tomorrow the film is released!

A charity event in Norwich this morning in aid of Age Concern Norfolk. Age Concern and gigolos: the perfect fit, or a promotional event too far? What would elderly Norfolks make of Trevor pimping Sacha to wealthy spinsters in the hair salons of Mayfair & Piccadilly?

I didn't wait to find out - I left under cover of darkness as reel 1 began, heading for London and a radio interview. But the merry clinking of complimentary tea cup on saucer and the nodding of heads told me that the audience was going to enjoy this one... or were the heads simply nodding off? I couldn't tell in the dark.

An appreciative audience and another hundred tickets sold: an excellent boost for a desperately-understaffed local organisation tirelessly working to promote the cause of the less fortunate.

Age Concern did pretty well out of the event, too.

The Times is Right

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:31:00 +0000

24 hours to go.
The review rollercoaster takes another ride into the dizzying heights, courtesy of The Times and another 3 stars, which we're collecting as fast as Ramsey and Roux.
Reviewing The Gigolos is a bit like Texas Hold'Em: the more you understand it, the better you are. The Times reviewer's insight into the "intimate camera work" suggests he don't go all-in with Jack high.
Like anything artistic, it's all about belief. You take the knocks knowing that at some point one reviewer's thoughts match your own. If you question opinions, you might as well ask the spoon if the soup tastes OK.

Variety

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:29:00 +0000

An incredible review from Variety.
The reviewer says the film "is a natural for rep houses and upmarket movie channels".
Variety is read by the US entertainment industry.
Let's just hope they read that.
Can't underestimate the importance of what's just happened.

Nuts about The Gigolos

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:59:00 +0000

Visionary magazine NUTS gives us 4 stars for the film - Carmen Electra's 3-DD assets only getting 3 stars for I Want Candy.
Can't contain the pure excitement that a top lads mag has taken time out (not to be confused with the short-sighted listings rag) from naked TV babes etc. to give us such a good shout 36 hours before we release.
In 28 words of blinding simplicity, NUTS says "Low budget comedy drama wth lots of cringeworthy laughs".
What can the producers of I Want Candy be thinking? They're probably hoping to appeal to the NUTS audience, then some film they've never heard of gets 1 more star.
Question: is it better to get 4 stars in NUTS or TIME OUT? Every marketing cell in my brain says TIME OUT... but the simple brilliance of the NUTS reviews blows everything away.
Will it translate to bums on seats? Who cares - we've got 4 stars in NUTS!

24

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:48:00 +0000

1 day to go.
Jack Bauer might be able to pack a lot into a day, but 24 hours seems as sure as shit a very short time to me. Sands of time slipping away.
G-Day is almost upon us, and there's still a shedload of beaches (collective noun for beaches? a whale of beaches?) to be stormed.
It's hard not to look back at what we've done and think, "How did things ever get so far?"
But tomorrow people will actually pay real money to see our film. In their hundreds, rather than in their tens, we hope...

300

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:59:00 +0000

Slightly relieved to see that the Time Out review of 300 was even worse than its one for The Gigolos. 300 only gets 1 star. We have a whole 2 stars. Does this make our film twice as good as 300?

Out of Time

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:59:00 +0000

2 days till release.
Crap review in Time Out. The reviewer didn't get the film. You're meant to be terribly British about bad reviews & take them on the chin. If you make films you have to have a very thick skin. But this really pisses me off. You work on a feature film for 3 years, take immense financial & personal risk, staking everything on getting your film out there. Because you know people will want to see it & will enjoy it.
How do we know this? Because we've watched it on Sunset Boulevard in Hollywood with execs from Paramount & Dreamworks in the audience, and 500 people loved it. Our screening was busier than the screening of Transamerica next door which had all four Desperate Housewives in attendance.
Then some bloke watches a DVD, doesn't get it & tells Londoners his opinions. I've got no probs with people not liking the film. That's life. I've never really liked Time Out. I've also got no probs with bad reviews which are insightful & intelligent. The LA Weekly reviewer trashed us, saying "no can do", explaining this kind of indie film didn't work for him. You've got to ride these hits.
My problem is that this is lazy reviewing. The Time Out reviewer writes that "it's unfunny to the point of becoming tedious". Has he actually watched the same film? We didn''t make The Gigolos as a comedy. But it is funny. At every screening we've been to - from Sunset Blvd to Dinard in France to Cambridge & London - audiences really enjoy the film and laugh.
The critic ends by wondering how Ricky Gervais and Stephen Merchant "would have spun this meaty set-up"... I love their work, but how many feature films have they written, produced, directed and performed in themselves, having raised all the cash to do it?
More respect please!
More respect for the audiences who watch the film and do laugh. Why don't they get to review the film for Time Out?
Fortunately we have a really sexy ad in Time Out which will more than make up for it.

12A

noreply@blogger.com (Tony B) — Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:52:00 +0000

4 days till release.
The BBFC confirms our certificate as 12A. Almost fell off my chair: we were convinced a film about gigolos was going to be a 15. Can this really mean that children as young as 12 will be allowed to see Sacha kissing Angela Pleasence? Surely this can't be safe.